FROZEN FIEFDOM 

THE AFFIDAVIT OF VALERIE BRITTINA ROSE, My daughter, aged 21

It's always good to know what opinions others have of me, especially my own daughter.  Items 1. and 2.  clearly addresses how Valerie views me.

Overall, I disagree with much of the content of her Affidavit.

Valerie's Affidavit is well written in a pseudo eloquent style which reflects her personality.  In Item 3.  her lack of specific dates, and lack of providing names of persons she is referring to, is a notable pattern which appears throughout all the Affidavits pertaining to this case.  Facts can't be proven or disputed, unless real information is stated. 

Item 4. REPEAT:  NO MP File on Paula Marie Rose has been produced.  LAPD website states "ZERO files" when my name is typed in. 

I don't recall denying renting a car; I rented 2 different vehicles in 2007, and have the paperwork for each, as would the rental agencies, and my credit card cos. have paid the charges.  I do recall asking Valerie for the specifics of how she knew about the one rental she mentioned to me, which was inaccurate, but enough to know that she somehow knew that I had rented one during the summer of 2007.  

Unfortunately, I have to point out that my own daughter is a liar, as Bank of America verified to me months ago that no Police inquires were conducted within my account at any time in 2007.  

Relevant selection from "B of A Emails and the Merlin Teller Printout" Section:

"May 17, 2008 UPDATE:  I had a telephone conversation with a Bank of America representative while sitting in the Agoura Hills branch this afternoon.  According to the records review by  the B of A Priority Services rep. named Antoniette; there is no record of any inquiry into my Visa card account ending in 3732 by any law enforcement personnel or others during July or August of 2007.  Antoniette also stated that she didn't have access to email to send me written verification of her records and words, but she did offer to tell me which regulations B of A follows to insure customer privacy, and that any inquires would have been noted on my account.  She also stated that B of A would only provide information to someone who had my personal information and password, and that law enforcement would not be granted access to my account activity information without a court order; none was on file.  She also stated that if Bank of America were to have given my Visa activity information to anyone other than me, they could be held liable for damages in huge lawsuits.  We agreed on that statement.  I also stated that my family members would have had access to much, if not all of my Visa card information, but probably not the password.  It is possible that someone could have been impersonating me to gain access to my private account information, and that my family could have been, and most likely was, lying to me about the entire incident. 

The Mystery still remains as to how Valerie knew specific information about a car rental, and mentioned the details to me about it at Christmas.  She states in writing (under her section), and had also verbally to me, that the Tarzana Police Department is who contacted Bank of America.  Sniff Sniff...That smells a little Fishy.  B of A stated that they wouldn't give my specific activity information to anyone other than me without a Court Order, and claims no Law Enforcement branch ever contacted them about my Visa card.  Valerie states that the Tarzana Police Department did contact B of A, and shared my activity information either directly, or indirectly, with herself and others.  But she had information about a specific car that I had rented (although her color description was slightly off) so this part of the story isn't adding up."

Item 5.  I can't recall the last time I ate at a Jack in the Box, as I don't care for their menu.  I ate at McDonalds just yesterday, down on Ventura Blvd. 

And who, what, where, when, why and how could Valerie possibly know what I was doing in L.A., when she was living in Juneau, AK, and Pensacola, Florida? Was she zooming in on me with high powered goggles; or was I being watched, and someone was reporting back to her, for some unknown reason?  Or much more likely, she's lying again.  

Valerie was a former, if not current employee of the business combo in Juneau which offers Private Mail Box Services / Adult Novelty Items, X Rated materials and movies, which some, and certainly Dr. Elaine Schroeder, might consider to be pure porn. 

In Dr. Elaine Schroeder's professional opinion, as stated in her Affidavit, she states "The highly sexualized nature of the website,..." when she refers to "Frozen Fiefdom."  Good Grief!!  If this is what she considers to be a highly sexualized website, then she has had a very sheltered life.  "Mild Teen to Adult Entertainment, Bursting With Fascinating Facts" would be a much more accurate description.  

I'd like to hear her professional opinion of what kind of a person Valerie must be; as she chose employment as a clerk who physically exchanges porn for cash, over the shop counter. 

Goodness!  She's probably not fit to be a sister to Claire, because the products she sells, or did sell, are exactly what her Mother was photoed with.  If the standard applies to one,

it must apply to all.  

I am surprised and amused at Valerie's prudishness over the photo of my decorated ride.  I'm certain that she has handled much more explicit materials than I have, and has engaged in many sexualized conversations with a variety of Juneau residents and visitors alike, while selling the shop wares.  

Item 6.   I can produce email and telephone records of contact between Valerie and myself, but why bother?   Her statements in this Affidavit speak for themselves; her highly emotional personality, and state of depression which had begun during June of 2007 when she was working many hours, having boyfriend issues, preparing to go away to college in Florida, were affecting her mental state. 
 

Item 7.  Another lie.  I didn't demand private interviews, Eric and I were divorced in 2006, and I don't care what anyone's opinion of that was, or is.  

I did tape a brief segment that unforgettable Christmas Eve morning, featuring a less than Hostess like outburst of controlling hostility from Anna Kathryn Sanders, with words of agreement from Eric William Swanson.  Of course,  as I have previously stated, Valerie was silent during that exchange, and I stated clearly at the time that I was recording it.

  **CLICK HEAR TO LISTEN**

Item 8.  I had cleared out the front passenger seat to take Claire shopping down in Key West, as I hadn't purchased gifts prior to leaving L.A. due to a lack of room in the car.  Claire was pleased, as she said she hadn't been down to the Ross yet, and wanted to go with me.   Valerie's last line of this paragraph is her opinion, but incorrect.  I know that I am fully mentally and physically well, and that she and others have difficulty telling the truth at times.  

Item 9.   Wow!  Feel the dramatic impact of Valerie's words.

Considering that Valerie hasn't replied to my emails since late Spring and last phoned me after Mother's Day in May, the statements in this paragraph are false, as they describe a current interaction, which would indicate a present, and ongoing relationship.*  So again we have an apparently pre-prepared statement; a Script, signed on October 17, 2008.

(*Note:  An elderly friend of the family passed away, and I forwarded an email with a note from me to Valerie and Claire on the evening of November 1, 2008.) 

Perhaps Valerie should drop out of college and come to L.A. to write script for Soap Operas.  I will say, I have a rather witty sense of humor and sometimes do write or think of something which amuses me, and I might smile or laugh, even when alone.  It's a sign of intelligence and well being, not mental illness.  

 Item 10.   and 11.  Valerie's statements indicate that she didn't  have the childhood she wanted.  Some of her disappointments in life probably were my fault, that cannot be changed.  She was a wonderful Big Sister to Claire.  That relationship may change, as Claire becomes aware of how her family views me.  

Valerie's statements about me in the pages of this affidavit, emails she and I have exchanged, and statements that she has made to and about me, are not what I would expect my daughter to say, or do. 

I am ashamed of Valerie's behavior, and of her, for her lies.  I have asked her to explain herself to me directly, especially about her statement that I was "going to kidnap Claire."   As of this updating on November 1, 2008, she has not done so. 

Valerie Brittina Rose is a young woman who has made some very poor choices, and they cannot be undone.