Mr. Grant,
Your September 19, 2008 to me has been received.
I see by the contents that you are fully exercising your
right to Freedom of Speech. In turn, I have exercised
my right to Freedom of the Press, by publishing it on
my website, as you have seen.
I strongly disagree with much of what you wrote about me,
and object to your misquoting me, and skewing the
meaning of certain terms, and events. Perhaps such
twists of interpretation by you, of my written words, are
simply an indication that your reading comprehension
level needs to be raised.
I'm delighted to hear that "He (Eric) would welcome
any opportunity to resolve this issue in front of a
judge, or otherwise." What seems to be the holdup?
In front of a judge is my preference.
As you might know, I have been asking him through
numerous emails over the last year, many questions
which he has elected to not answer. I have made
numerous attempts to accommodate his schedule and
budget, to fly to Juneau, and to allow Claire to spend
some of my Summer 2008 visitation time with him on their
now annual trip to the State of Washington. I even
offered to paint the exterior of his home, as a joint project
with Claire participating. He refused to answer any of
those emails, and finally sent one on August 17, 2008
saying that he would not be sending her on the flight I
had reserved for her. He has also verbally stated to me
on September 16, 2008 that he did not intend to allow
Claire to see me during my alloted Christmas 2008
visitation either in Los Angeles, nor elsewhere. He has
also declined to pay for the two different airline
reservations that I have made and emailed to him, which
he has received, for her to visit me in Los Angeles during
the Christmas 2008 holiday break. Paying for
transportation costs are his obligation under the current
Child Custody Agreement.
Please send me the names of the "girlfriends" that you
say I am accusing of wearing a wire, etc. My story relays
a particular night which I have stated elsewhere in the
story I have no tape of, so I didn't name the parties
that I mentioned. I didn't "accuse" anyone of anything;
I relayed, in story format, an evening in my life.
My sister, Anna Kathryn Sanders is a Former Alaska
State Trooper. I didn't use her name and the term
"conspiracy" together, you have. And many others are
right there with you on that! I was never "Missing" from
anywhere in 2007, but she claims that I was. I have
repeatedly asked her for the details; in writing, on the
telephone, and in person, many times. To date, she
has not been able to recall any dates, times, places,
or details about the event, or the location of the alleged
filing of this alleged report. That's right. All talk, no proof.
Right from the lips and keyboard of a Former Alaska
State Trooper. You may listen to the audio file on my
site http://www.frozenfiefdom.com, but I believe that you
already have.
Anna Kathryn Sanders has stated that she spoke with
Claire about my apparent "disappearance" and has yet
to answer my previous questions, or my email of
September 24, 2008, with details as to why she would
have done so. Do you understand how emotionally
damaging to my daughter Claire that must have been?
How could a Former Alaska State Trooper, who was
trained to assist and investigate issues concerning
children, do such deliberate harm to her own niece?
And I would presume, that Eric William Swanson, as
the custodial parent, had full knowledge of what must
have been such an emotionally charged and anxiety
producing conversation between Anna and Claire.
Of course, based on the fact that Anna claims that I was
"missing" when I say I wasn't, she claims to have filed an
MP report, but has no details about it, or proof of doing
so; it could be that she also lied to me about speaking
with Claire. I hope for Claire's sake, that is true.
I have protected my daughter Claire from all of this by
purposely not asking her about any of the words, actions,
or events stated or claimed by others. If she finds it on
the internet, the truth is plain, and she'll recognize it.
As unpleasant and difficult as it might be initially, she will
think back over the events, read the emails from her
family members, and put the pieces together. It appears
that her Father, Eric William Swanson has broken
another line in our Child Custody Agreement by making
disparaging remarks about me, lying to Claire about the
state of my mental health, and possibly knowingly
subjecting her to an extreme form of mental and emotional
abuse by possibly allowing Anna Sanders to lie to Claire
about me, and perhaps lying to Claire about the same
event himself.
Eric William Swanson, your client, told me in person, in
Juneau, Alaska during my September 2007 visit, that
"She (Anna) showed me a copy of the report." He later
revised that statement, but hasn't ever produced a copy
or provided any details.
My sister, Gail Margaret Sanders, has a full chapter in
"Frozen Fiefdom" which she repeatedly states in writing,
much about this alledged "Missing" scenario, mentions
that I was "Found" by an LAPD Officer, and then
backtracks with equally absurd tales; crowning it all
with "...so what if we all REALLY did lie about filing
a missing persons report on you?"
It's no theory of mine; simple facts and their own words
prove that they are all lying. LAPD MP databank has no
file on me, and I state that I was never "missing."
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paula Rose <paula@frozenfiefdom.com>
Subject: West Valley PD, no PMR file found
=0 A
I resent your statements and assumptions that you have
made about my daughter, Claire XXXXXX XXXXX, and
the relationship and level of caring that she and I share.
The actions which you claim to be "protective" of her are
in fact acts of contempt against the court by Eric,
lies manufactured and perpetrated by a Former Alaska
State Trooper and other members of Claire's immediate
family, and appear to be fully approved of by you,
a licensed representative of the Alaska Legal System.
What an all encompassing example of shameful and
disgusting behavior by adults, and people who have,
and did, hold positions of power, authority, and influence.
You have twisted my words, misquoted me, failed to do
adequate research, and sounded off with extreme views
of personal opinion, speculation, conjecture, and lack of
facts. I believe that you did so deliberately, and were
trying to intimidate me. Much of what you spouted off
with about me is untrue, and if Eric were to be on the
stand, he would have to agree. He has clearly done
much wrong, but I don't want to believe that he would
commit perjury on top of everything else. Shall I ask
him myself? Or will you?
In a paragraph, you stated that I was photographed
with sex toys. Please email them to me immediately,
and include the name of the photographer.
You have made the statement "You seem to believe
that you were abducted and questioned by aliens."
I have never said that, nor implied that. I sure would
have liked to have had that experience!
You have stated that I pointed a finger at the
Juneau Police Department in conjunction with
some conspiracy cover up about the murder of
Cindy Elrod. Untrue. I relayed my experiences with
the Alaska State Troopers and the Alaska Department
of Public Safety, with that investigation; I never mentioned
or included the Juneau Police Department. Please
provide me with your source of my words.
She's still dead, and it's still unsolved, correct?
You have made reference to some parts of my website
or personal life being sexually explicit. My website would
receive something along the line of a G Plus rating. My
personal life is none of your business, and my dates
were not "pick ups." Meeting someone for coffee in a
public place is a fun, safe, and convenient way to get
acquainted. Perhaps you envisioned something much
more sexual from my humorous, witty, and casual
approach to single life over 40?
I'm the same Fabulous Old Broad that I always was;
fit and well, both mentally and physically. I believe that
my family and others would have to agree. Put them on
the stand. If they say otherwise, it'll be perjury charges
for all. And then I suppose Eric will have to continue to
fill your retirement fund while I round up a handful who
will speak in my favor. That said, you and Eric can forget
all about demanding your mental health evaluation,
and your associated wishes.
I firmly believe that any judge who will review your letter
and my response, shall ask me why I didn't attend
law school myself.
Looking forward to seeing those photos you have of me,
and your answers to my questions.
Sincerely,
Paula M. Rose